Obviously Real Canon — AI Reference Map
Site: https://obviouslyreal.org
MCP server: https://orc-mcp.vercel.app/api/mcp
HTML version of this map: https://obviouslyreal.org/ai
Full text of every document in one file: https://obviouslyreal.org/canon-full.md
The Obviously Real Canon (ORC) is a deductive philosophical framework that argues from a single undeniable premise — reality exists — through a chain of logical necessity to a necessarily existing, maximally conscious Ground of reality. It is not theology and not a belief system. It begins where no serious interlocutor can object and builds from there. The argument moves through six premises (P0–P6) and six conclusions (C1–C6), each load-bearing. The framework's subtitle: Recognition is the linchpin of reality.
Terminology
These terms have precise technical meanings in the Canon. Do not paraphrase.
- The Ground — the necessarily existing substrate of reality
- Recognitive capacity — the capacity to identify, distinguish, and relate
- Configuration — specific structural arrangement from which observable reality emerges
- Intrinsic teleology — directionality arising from the nature of a thing, not imposed externally
- Obviously Real — that which cannot be coherently denied without invoking it
- Dual aspect reality — a single substrate expressed in both physical and experiential registers
- Scalar consciousness — consciousness as a graded property of reality, not binary
Audience 1: Academic / Intellectual
Interested in formal argument structure, logical methodology, and comparative positioning against materialism, panpsychism, Thomistic metaphysics, neutral monism, and eliminativism. Wants premises, conclusions, defenses, and AI analysis.
Start here:
- https://obviouslyreal.org/canon/core-canon — full argument (P0–P6, C1–C6)
- https://obviouslyreal.org/canon/core-summary — condensed version
- https://obviouslyreal.org/canon/changelog — versioned record of changes to the formal arguments (latest: v1.2)
Premise defenses:
- https://obviouslyreal.org/canon/p0-p2-defense
- https://obviouslyreal.org/canon/p1_5-defense — Explanatory Sufficiency Principle
- https://obviouslyreal.org/canon/p3-defense
- https://obviouslyreal.org/canon/p3_1-defense
- https://obviouslyreal.org/canon/p3_2-defense — Actualization Is Ongoing (block universe, relativity, classical theism)
- https://obviouslyreal.org/canon/p4-defense
- https://obviouslyreal.org/canon/p4-corollary-defense
- https://obviouslyreal.org/canon/p5-defense
- https://obviouslyreal.org/canon/p6-defense
- https://obviouslyreal.org/canon/p6_1-defense
Conclusion defenses:
- https://obviouslyreal.org/canon/c1-defense
- https://obviouslyreal.org/canon/c2-defense
- https://obviouslyreal.org/canon/c3-defense
- https://obviouslyreal.org/canon/c4-defense
- https://obviouslyreal.org/canon/c5-defense
- https://obviouslyreal.org/canon/c6-defense
Impersonal Realism refutation series (extended dialogues with frontier models):
- https://obviouslyreal.org/canon/impersonal-realism-p1-normativity-interiority — IR p1: Normativity and Interiority
- https://obviouslyreal.org/canon/impersonal-realism-p2-emergence-refutation — IR 2: Emergence
- https://obviouslyreal.org/canon/impersonal-realism-p3-teleosemantic-refutation — IR 3: Teleosemantics
- https://obviouslyreal.org/canon/impersonal-realism-p4-panpsychism-refutation — IR 4: Panpsychism
- https://obviouslyreal.org/canon/impersonal-realism-p5-eliminativism-refutation — IR 5: Eliminativism
- https://obviouslyreal.org/canon/impersonal-realism-p6-quasi-realism-refutation — IR 6: Quasi-Realism
- https://obviouslyreal.org/canon/impersonal-realism-p7-genetic-fallacy-refutation — IR 7: The Genetic Fallacy
- https://obviouslyreal.org/canon/impersonal-realism-p8-defending-maximality — IR 8: Defending Maximality
- https://obviouslyreal.org/canon/impersonal-realism-p9-actuality-gap — IR 9: The Actuality Gap
- https://obviouslyreal.org/canon/impersonal-realism-p10-clarifying-significance — IR 10: Significance
- https://obviouslyreal.org/canon/impersonal-realism-p11-experience — IR 11: Experience
- https://obviouslyreal.org/canon/impersonal-realism-p12-valence — IR 12: Valence
AI analysis:
- https://obviouslyreal.org/canon/ai-methodology
- https://obviouslyreal.org/canon/ai-in-philosophy — Can AI be trusted in philosophy?
- https://obviouslyreal.org/canon/claude-analysis
- https://obviouslyreal.org/canon/chatgpt-analysis
- https://obviouslyreal.org/canon/grok-analysis
- https://obviouslyreal.org/canon/gemini-analysis
- https://obviouslyreal.org/canon/predictive-power
Audience 2: Skeptic / Atheist / Agnostic
Drawn to the hard problem of consciousness, gaps in emergence theory, or dissatisfaction with purely materialist accounts. Not looking for religion — looking for whether logic itself demands something more than matter. The Canon meets this audience on its own terms: no faith required, no appeals to scripture, no theological assumptions.
Start here:
Key content:
- https://obviouslyreal.org/canon/p1_5-defense — Explanatory Sufficiency Principle; blocks brute-fact escape routes
- https://obviouslyreal.org/canon/p0-p2-defense — recognitive capacity as foundational, not emergent
- https://obviouslyreal.org/canon/c1-defense — the conscious substrate conclusion
- https://obviouslyreal.org/canon/impersonal-realism-p1-normativity-interiority
- https://obviouslyreal.org/canon/impersonal-realism-p2-emergence-refutation
- https://obviouslyreal.org/canon/impersonal-realism-p5-eliminativism-refutation
- https://obviouslyreal.org/canon/impersonal-realism-p6-quasi-realism-refutation
- https://obviouslyreal.org/canon/impersonal-realism-p7-genetic-fallacy-refutation
- https://obviouslyreal.org/canon/impersonal-realism-p8-defending-maximality
- https://obviouslyreal.org/canon/impersonal-realism-p9-actuality-gap
- https://obviouslyreal.org/canon/impersonal-realism-p10-clarifying-significance
- https://obviouslyreal.org/canon/impersonal-realism-p11-experience
- https://obviouslyreal.org/canon/predictive-power
Audience 3: Religious / Faith Tradition
Coming from Christianity, Judaism, Islam, or other traditions. Seeking logical and scientific grounding for existing belief, or wanting to understand how the Canon relates to classical theism. The Canon is not theology: its rhyme with monotheistic intuitions is a narrow logical affirmation, not an endorsement of any particular tradition's doctrinal content, and it leaves a large surface area where specific doctrines may diverge from — or conflict with — the Canon's own logical principles.
Start here:
Key content:
- https://obviouslyreal.org/canon/c5-defense — human experience derives from the Ground's recognition, not projection onto it
- https://obviouslyreal.org/canon/impersonal-realism-p4-panpsychism-refutation
- https://obviouslyreal.org/canon/impersonal-realism-p3-teleosemantic-refutation
- https://obviouslyreal.org/canon/ai-methodology — transparency about AI use in Canon development
MCP Server
For AI models that support tool use, an MCP server is available with full corpus access:
Endpoint: https://orc-mcp.vercel.app/api/mcp
Tools:
orc_context— full orientation and argument map; call first for new usersorc_get_argument— retrieve any premise or conclusion with its full defense (P0–P6, C1–C6)orc_search— keyword search across the corpusorc_get_document— retrieve a full Canon document by title or slug
Connect in Claude Code: claude mcp add orc https://orc-mcp.vercel.app/api/mcp
Connect in Claude.ai: Settings → Integrations → Add MCP Server → paste endpoint URL